Hi all. I have a EOS R5 and I already own a RF 16-35mm f/2,8 and a RF 70-200mm f/2,8 along with the EF 300mm f/4 and the EF 8-15mm f/4 fisheye. Now I have a question since I own also an EF 24-70mm F/2.8L I USM zoom lens. Is it worth accodording to your opinion to sell/upgrade this current zoomAlternatives. Canon EF 24-70mm Ζ/2.8L II USM ~$2,400 There's a reason you pay almost $1,000 more for the 24-70mm Ζ/2.8: in addition to the faster constant aperture, its image quality is much
The Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR is frankly enormous and the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM doesnβt even feature image stabilization. Little shorter than the Canon and Tamron alternatives;
Canon RF. Canon EF. weather-sealed (splashproof) Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM. Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a metal mount. Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM. Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art.A decade later, Canon introduced the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM, a worthy successor to the ultra-popular 24-70mm lens it replaced with improvements to image sharpness, vignetting and AF speed. A disapointment to us was that Canon decided not to include image stabilization as one of the upgraded features, claiming that excellent image quality was
KCBaqj.